🔁 Passive & Impersonal Forms
How Polish says something was done without saying who did it. Three constructions, each with its own register — and the impersonal ones are far more common in real Polish than the textbook passive.
🗺️ Three ways to lose the subject
English has essentially one passive ("the house was built"). Polish has three constructions competing for that job, and choosing between them is a register decision.
| Construction | Shape | Feel | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| strona bierna true passive |
być / zostać + passive participle | formal, often written; can name the agent | Dom został zbudowany. |
| forma z „się" reflexive impersonal |
się + 3rd person singular | everyday, general truths, rules | Tu mówi się po polsku. |
| forma na -no / -to past impersonal |
participle stem + -no / -to | reports, history, news — past only | Zbudowano dom. |
1️⃣ The true passive — być vs zostać
Both take a passive participle. The choice between them is aspect all over again.
zostać + perfective participle → a single completed event
agent, if named: przez + accusative
Passive or just a description?
One genuinely tricky pair. Być + participle can describe an action or a resulting state, and Polish distinguishes them where English does not.
Rule of thumb: if you could add przez kogoś ("by someone") and it still makes sense, it is a passive. If not, it is a state.
2️⃣ The się impersonal — everyday Polish
This is what Poles actually say. No subject, no agent, third person singular, and się doing the work. English reaches for "one", "you", "people", or its own passive.
mówi się — one says / it is said
je się — one eats / is eaten
nie pali się — no smoking
3️⃣ The -no / -to impersonal — the report form
Past tense only, no subject, no gender, no number. This is the voice of news reports, history books and official accounts: something was done, and who did it is not the point.
zbudowany → zbudowano · otwarty → otwarto
czytany → czytano · powiedziany → powiedziano
znaleziony → znaleziono
The form never changes — not for gender, not for number. Zbudowano covers "it was built", "they were built", "he was built", all of it.
🎯 Which one should you use?
| Situation | Reach for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Formal letter, naming who acted | zostać + participle | only the true passive can take przez + agent |
| A general truth or custom | się | no time reference, no actor |
| A rule or prohibition on a sign | się | this is the idiomatic form |
| Reporting a past event, actor irrelevant | -no / -to | the register of news and history |
| Describing how something is | być + participle | a state, not an action |
| Casual speech | się, or just 3rd person plural | Mówią, że… — "they say" — is often the most natural of all |
🧪 Check yourself
| Prompt | Answer |
|---|---|
| Rewrite as a true passive: Anna napisała list. | List został napisany przez Annę. |
| Rewrite with -no: Otworzyli nową szkołę. | Otwarto nową szkołę. — object stays accusative |
| Rewrite with się: "Bread is eaten here." | Tu je się chleb. |
| State or passive? Drzwi są zamknięte. | State — the doors are shut. The event would be Drzwi zostały zamknięte. |
| Fix: ✗ Szkoła został zbudowany. | Szkoła została zbudowana. — feminine agreement throughout |
| Fix: ✗ Zbudowano nowy most został. | Zbudowano nowy most. — -no is already the whole verb; no być/zostać |
📌 Where this shows up in the exam
All three constructions are named in the B2 standard (Dz.U. 2016 poz. 405, annex II F) under strony and formy bezosobowe, both marked w ograniczonym zakresie.
| Module | How it appears |
|---|---|
| Reading | Press texts run on -no/-to and the się impersonal. Misreading Otwarto as an adjective loses the sentence. |
| Grammatical correctness | Transformation tasks: rewrite an active sentence as a passive, or the reverse. Agreement of the participle is the marked point. |
| Writing | A list urzędowy or sprawozdanie written entirely in the active voice reads as too informal for the task. |